Wednesday, September 30, 2009

CSCMP - Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals

CSCMP Mission: To lead the evolving supply chain management profession by developing, advancing, and disseminating supply chain knowledge and research.
CSCMP Vision: The Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals is the preeminent worldwide professional association of supply chain management professionals.
CSCMP exists to:
Provide opportunities for supply chain professionals to communicate in order to develop and improve their supply chain management skills
Identify and conduct research which adds to the knowledge base of supply chain theory and practice
Create awareness of the significance of supply chain to business and to the economy

CSCMP Values: As a professional not-for-profit organization, the Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals holds these values:
We operate with the highest standards of integrity and ethics.
We are committed to the individual professional development of our members.
We are an inclusive organization, open to all who wish to enhance their supply chain management knowledge.

We endeavor to be the supply chain management thought leaders by encouraging, promoting, and disseminating leading edge products and services.
We endeavor to offer products and services of the highest quality.

CSCMP Goals:
1) Provides leadership in developing, defining, understanding, and enhancing the logistics and supply chain management profession.
2) Enhances member value through education, networking, research, communication, and other services
3) Operates with sound business practices.

There are local CSCMP groups across Asia , Australia and the globe.
i urge you to hit the website and take advantage of the councils collaterals, expertise and members.

Monday, September 28, 2009

Buying a WMS in an M and A environment

With quite a few mergers & acquisitions in the WMS space during the recent months, I was wondering what should be the strategy for companies planning to implement a WMS?
Also, for companies that have already implemented these packages, what should be their strategy with respect to upgrades, support etc.?
Full Article:

Adapted from a response by Jim Willems on 10/03/2008. I believe that if a company completes an accurate selection process (meaning they buy a system according to their needs not their desires) and they structure the contract terms correctly, the consolidation of the WMS industry should be minimal. In my experience most clients are looking for a 5 to 7 year life from their WMS - meaning their system should be up and live prior to their vendor being purchased. Most acquiring firms are not going to immediately change anything, allowing for the client to get even closer to the point of their systems live expectancy. If the new vendor does significantly changes to the culture, pricing, and system the client should be at a point of having their ROI and able to move to a new system if needed.

Monday, September 14, 2009

Explaining the Value of Logistics to the CEO

By Adrian Gonzalez - ARC Advisory Group
Is logistics a cost center or a competitive differentiator? Is it a core competency or a function that should be outsourced?
I would argue that most CEOs, at least historically, have viewed logistics as a cost center (trucks, warehouses, overhead, etc.), a business function that falls short of their "core competency" definition. This perspective has led to the ongoing growth (except for this year) of the logistics outsourcing (3PL) industry.
Of course, just because a business function is not considered a core competency, or is outsourced to a third party, doesn't necessarily mean that it's not valued by the CEO. The true test of value is whether a CEO is willing to continue investing in logistics, either internally-in people, technology, assets, etc.-or by developing more strategic relationships with 3PL partners. If neither type of investment is taking place, then you have a problem.
Is this the case at your company? If so, how do you explain the value of logistics to your CEO?
The common advice is to communicate the value of logistics in terms the CEO, as well as the CFO, can understand. In other words, you have to speak their language, which entails linking logistics with financial metrics. Unfortunately, many logistics executives are financial illiterates. If you can't read and understand an income statement or balance sheet, for example, then your ability to effectively communicate the value of logistics to the CEO/CFO is severely limited.
Placing logistics in a financial context will get your foot in the door, but is it enough?
I don't think so. CEOs suffer from a similar deficiency: most of them are supply chain and logistics illiterates. They are often the weakest link in a company's supply chain, as Rueben E. Slone, Executive VP of Supply Chain at Office Max, and his co-authors wrote in "Are You the Weakest Link in Your Company's Supply Chain?" (Harvard Business Review, September 2007). "In this article," the authors wrote, "we advise CEOs not to become unwitting weak links in their companies' own supply chain strategies. The costs of neglecting important matters of supply chain management are damaging to any type of business for which SCM is potentially a competitive differentiator (most notably, manufacturing, retail, and distribution). CEOs should get involved."
Sir William Osler, MD, the father of modern medicine, once said, "Medicine is learned by the bedside and not in the class room. Let not your conception of manifestations of disease come from work heard in the lecture room or read from the book: see and then research, compare and control. But see first."
In order for CEOs to truly appreciate the value of logistics, they too must see first...by spending the day picking goods at the warehouse; driving shotgun on a delivery truck; finding capacity for uncovered loads; tracking and tracing shipments; building pallets near the loading dock; calling vendors overseas, and taking calls from customers, in both cases the same question: Where's our order?
If getting your CEO immersed in your logistics operations is too much to ask, then have him attend a supply chain and logistics conference...or two or three, especially the ones organized by the software and technology vendors that power your logistics processes. While not as good as see first, spending a few days with supply chain and logistics professionals, from many different companies and industries, presenting case studies and discussing industry trends, is still a valuable type of seeing and hearing.
How do you explain the value of logistics to a CEO? You don't. The value has to be experienced firsthand, like getting soaked in the rain. Everything else is just words and numbers.

Thursday, September 10, 2009

A Strategic Hole in the WMS Market

A Strategic Hole in the WMS Market

Consolidation looms in WMS market

Top WMS suppliers gain more market share in shrinking market By Dave Hannon

Recessions tend to drive market consolidation, as the lean revenues thin out the herd in nearly all markets. And the warehouse management systems (WMS) market is no exception, say market analysts at ARC Advisory Group.

In a recent report, ARC analysts say the top-tier vendors in the WMS market saw strong growth in 2008, as they have in most of the past 10 years ARC has performed the study. However, that trend of the big getting bigger cannot continue for much longer, and soon—maybe as soon as next year—the WMS market will have consolidated to the point where the only way the top five vendors can grow is by taking over one of the other top five.

Overall the WMS market shrank by 1% in 2008 and is forecast to decline again this year in total size before trending back up to grow again in 2010 through 2013. Compound annual growth for the WMS market through 2013 is forecast to be 2.2%, but much of that top-line growth is driven by the largest vendors.

“ARC expects that at least 10 WMS suppliers will go out of business”in 2010, says Steve Banker, ARC analyst. “In a smaller, consolidated market, the major suppliers will find that the WMS market is much more of a zero sum game. One vendor’s growth will come at another’s expense.”
And among the smaller vendors, there is likely to be a snowball effect—as WMS buyers get more concerned about the risk or going with a lesser-known vendor, they will ask those vendors to open up their books. “And many will fail that test,” ARC reports.